Home Blog Page 1055

英国新首相:不用害怕中国人,中国不会主宰世界

0

作者:奥德赛君  来源:好声量

  刚才,英国保守党官方宣布,大伦敦市前市长、前外交大臣鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnson, 庄汉生),当选为新的保守党主席,也将因此就任新的英国首相。

""
""

  他对中国的态度到底如何呢?
  奥德赛君挖出了他在2005年9月1日为《每日电讯报》撰写的一篇文章,并做了翻译。
  (老规矩:选译但不做改动、英文原文请点击文尾“阅读原文”)
  彼时的BJ哥,是《每日电讯报》的首席政治专栏作者、国会议员,刚刚辞任保守党副主席。
  《每日电讯报》创刊于大清咸丰五年(1855年),在英国国内的销量稳居前五。
  注:下文中的肯·利文斯通,是约翰逊主政大伦敦市之前的市长,工党,民主社会主义者。任内最着名的政策,就是向在特定时间、进入特定区域的私家车征收“中心区拥堵费”。政治倾向偏向极左翼,被人称为“红肯”。


原标题:中国会不
会赚了我们的底裤?

  通常,周三的午餐时间,我都会跟我的朋友一起吐槽肯·利文斯通这个疯子,顺便嘲弄几句他的“大伦敦计划”。我的朋友恨透了“中心区拥堵费”;而我最不能忍的,是那些老是把骑车人撞到马路牙子上的、卖熏香肠的面包车。
  但是这周,利文斯通的发癫已经超乎人类的想象。你知道他是怎么花我们上缴的百万英镑“进城费”的吗?那个老疯子买了一百多万支禽流感疫苗到处发,我猜吧——所以他的喽啰们就可以在流感爆发之前继续查车,尽管根本罚不了几个钱。
  这简直是在挥霍纳税人的血汗钱。不错,这是“红肯”的又一力作,他的癫狂行为已经感染了卫生部。他们已经拟好了“精英”名单,里面当然是政府部长和BBC高层,那些人都愿意在鸡瘟泛滥时,继续为国效劳,而且都将因此,免费享受神奇的药物。
  把我逼疯的,不是被“精英”名单除名(别怕,我们的对手们对大不列颠的运转没啥卵用),但禽流感真的让人焦虑。自2003年发现禽流感以来,已经夺走了57条人命,其中大部分,都是愿意给他们病恹恹的斗鸡,去做人工呼吸、心肺复苏的亚洲人。
  亚洲鸡瘟之外,你应该知道,结核病正折磨着900万人;他们中,有200万会在明年死去;你应该知道,五亿人正饱受疟疾之苦。所以,我们为什么要愚蠢地用亚洲鸡瘟吓唬自己?因为这都源于我们对远东新势力的恐惧,尤其是中国。
  讨论“中国威胁论”已经成为我们眼中的新时尚。中国是疑难杂症的孵化器;是被维多利亚式老工厂严重污染的地方;苦力们排着队吐痰;人们只吃大米和穿山甲的脾脏;他们生产的廉价胸罩和内衣像龙卷风一样吹到大洋对岸,把别人家自己的制造业摧残到只会搭火柴棍。
  “从地缘政治学上分析,中国会是下一个超级大国”,“二十一世纪将会是北京的世纪”,“如果想要孩子们在国际新秩序中站住脚,一定要让他们学普通话”等等、等等,这些论调,已经搞得人们耳朵长茧子了。
  这些都是无稽之谈,始作俑者是工党的贸易谈判代表曼德尔森,和他对中国进口纺织品所做的、近乎疯狂的配额制决定。从今往后,莱茵河与斯海尔德河河口,每年将吃掉5000万条中国生产的低价裤子。
  让我把观点摆明了吧:不用害怕中国人。中国不会主宰世界。我们不用教宝宝们讲普通话,我们的“恐中”情绪放错地方了。就算他们有13亿人,有着出口导向的、快速增长的经济,中国经济还是不如意大利,但这不重要。主宰世界——成为超级大国,关乎硬实力和软实力,关乎军事实力和文化影响力。
  和以往的大英帝国,和现在的美帝国相比,中国文化的影响力近乎于零,而且不大可能增长,离闻名海外还远着呢。英语传播广泛,好莱坞也是,但中国文化还是坚守在自家门口。
  确实,达到一定高度的中国文化艺术,几乎都是对西方的模仿:中国的钢琴家,厉害,但都在弹舒伯特和拉赫玛尼诺夫;中国芭蕾舞团,厉害,但都为佳吉列夫舞蹈;中国诺贝尔奖获得者,厉害,都是在海外赢的;中国的天才们都在想,逃到斯坦福和加州理工去。
  世界上到处都有唐人街和中国菜,但在英国,中国菜的影响力和印度菜相比还是差太多了。中餐厅的年营业额大概是282万英镑,印度餐厅是20个亿。你很难想到奥运会上有哪项运动来自中国,怎么能和我大不列颠发明的运动相比呢,包括乒乓球,我一定要让你知道,乒乓球起源于英伦上流社会的餐桌游戏。
  汉字那么复杂,他们自己却连个键盘都造不出来。你认识多少能讲一句完整汉语的人?文化、语言和更广的传播才是主宰全球的力量。按照古罗马人、我们大不列颠人和美国人的路数,中国人还没翻出自家院墙呢。
  谈起军事实力——硬实力,我们更没必要害怕。中国可能是有250万军队,但总共只有20枚洲际导弹,离成为世界级拳头还远着呢。跟美国人打起仗来,可能会放一场不错的烟火秀。
  当然,这些话绝不是有意对辉煌的中华文化表示不敬;但我想强调的是,他们在任何方面都没法成为,或试图成为世界级强国。中国人既没有能力、也没有意愿去主宰世界。他们仅仅是想要自由贸易,这是应该被积极鼓励的。
  崭露头角的中国,逐渐加入到经济全球化的进程中。这本可以为经济增长和抑制通货膨胀起到帮助,是件大好事。但是,看到我们的政客胆小如鼠、畏首畏尾,实在让人难过。

  鲍里斯·约翰逊:1964年6月19日出生在纽约曼哈顿上东城。
  拥有英美双国籍;2016年,他放弃美国国籍。
  父亲斯坦利·约翰逊,也曾任英国国会议员;
  外公是曾任欧洲人权委员会主席的詹姆斯·法塞特爵士
  妹妹是记者,三弟是普华永道的合伙人,四弟是现国会议员、商务部副大臣。
  父母离婚后,后妈是马莎百货前主席泰迪·谢夫的继女。
  学霸生涯
  1977年秋,入读伊顿公学,获得英皇奖学金。他能讲流利的法语、意大利语、德语和西班牙语,尤精熟拉丁语,经常引用拉丁格言。
  伊顿公学创立于1440年(明英宗时期),培养了二十位首相。
  着名校友包括:波义耳、雪莱、乔治·奥威尔、弗莱明、凯恩斯、威灵顿公爵、威廉王子……
  1983年秋,约翰逊拿到牛津大学贝利奥尔学院的奖学金,读了四年古典学。
  他也因此成为了赫胥黎、亚当·斯密、阿诺德·汤因比、怀特海、理查德·道金斯等人的师弟。
  他最好的朋友,是戴安娜王妃的弟弟、第九代斯宾塞伯爵。
  手中笔如枪
  1987年底,通过家族关系,他在《泰晤士报》实习并很快转正。但不久,他引用了一段自己编造的话作为权威来源,因此被解雇。
  很快,他通过在牛津的人脉,来到《每日电讯报》工作。约翰逊的文章,使他成为撒切尔夫人最喜欢的记者。
  1998年,约翰逊在电视节目《我有新闻告诉你》中崭露头角,被公众熟识。
  在2001年的国会选举中,在其知名度的帮助下,赢得了多数票。除担任议员、继续在《每日电讯报》写专栏之外,他还——
  出版了《朋友、选民、国民:树桩记事》一书,讲述2001年的竞选;
  出版了专栏合集《把你的耳朵借给我》
  2004年,发表了小说《七十二个处女:错误的喜剧》
  策划了历史节目《罗马的梦想》;2006年1月播出,同名书2月出版。
  推出了续集《罗马之后》,讲述早期的伊斯兰历史。
  主政帝都
  2007年3月,人气爆棚的约翰逊参选大伦敦市长。就连反对他的人,都抱着这样的态度:
  “我投给鲍里斯,因为他逗笑好玩。”
  毫无悬念当选的约翰逊,在市长任上主要采取了这些措施:

  •   结束了与委内瑞拉的石油交易;
  •   取消“黑的”的半年检、缩减收拥堵费的区域;
  •   完善公共自行车计划“鲍里斯自行车”并开发新伦敦巴士;
  •   建造连通格林威治半岛和皇家码头的缆车;
  •   支持最低生活工资、大赦非法移民、禁止刊登“同性恋有病”的广告;
  •   自封首都警察监管局主席,推动伦敦的整体犯罪率下降。

  2012年,再次当选大伦敦市长,见证伦敦成功主办2012年奥运会。
  2016年5月卸任市长。离任后的民调显示,52%的伦敦人认为他的市长做得不错,只有29%认为他做得糟糕。
  东山再起
  2016年6月,英国公民投票决定“脱欧”,卡梅伦辞职,约翰逊当时就被认为领跑保守党领袖和首相替补人选。但在正式竞选之前,约翰逊自己宣布退出,理由是“不能提供党当前需要的团结”。
  特蕾莎·梅当选后,被任命为外交及联邦事务大臣。
  2018年7月,约翰逊辞去公职,保留议员职务。
  争议
  当选市长后,在阳台上建了个棚子,没有获得规划许可;被邻居投诉,被迫拆除。
  报销的出租车费太多,副市长因此辞职。
  被指在奥运会开幕前通过除尘剂来掩盖污染。
  瞒报5万英镑的收入。
  花边
  2000年以来,约翰逊一直与报社同事彼得罗纳·怀亚特暧昧,后者两次流产。约翰逊回应为“瞎扯淡”。这件事被好事者改编为戏剧《谁是爸爸?》,2005年7月在国王剧院首演。
  2006年4月,《世界新闻报》指约翰逊与记者安娜·法扎克利有婚外情。
  2009年,约翰逊与艺术顾问海伦·麦金泰尔生下一女。
  言论
  2002年:“女王在英联邦国家的巡游会受到挥舞着旗帜的黑人小孩欢迎”;“在刚果,布莱尔会遇到‘西瓜微笑’”;同性恋男子是“穿紧身短背心的兄弟”。
  2006年9月:“保守党领袖选举就像新几内亚土着的自相残杀。”
  2007年11月,希拉里第一次竞选总统期间,称她为“精神病院的虐待护士”。
  2012年2月,批评伦敦的圣帕特里克节活动,称之为“左翼垃圾”。
  2013年7月,在伦敦举行的世界伊斯兰经济论坛上,“马来西亚妇女上大学是为了找丈夫”。
  2016年5月,一首讽刺土耳其总统埃尔多安的打油诗在“恶搞埃尔多安诗歌大赛”中获胜,得到1000英镑奖金。
  2017年1月访问仰光大金塔时,随口吟诵了一段英国作家吉卜林的《曼德勒之路》,作品带有美化殖民主义的色彩。
  2018年5月,英国前俄罗斯间谍毒杀案后,约翰逊将普京治下的2018年世界杯与1936年希特勒治下的奥运会作比较。
  2018年6月,当被问及企业界对英国“硬”脱欧的担忧时,约翰逊曾说过“他妈的商务(fxxk business)。”
  2018年7月,约翰逊表示反对针对穆斯林罩袍或面纱的禁令,但暗示这种服装穿起来像银行抢劫犯。

  编辑/量  妹
  审核/声  儒
  签发/阿  谷

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/23

旧文章ID:19150

52名专家联合声明:不同种族的平均智商差异是科学事实

0

作者:  来源:博士学者圈子

  不同种族之间的平均智商差异在学术领域已经被广泛承认,但是因为西方的“政治正确”,这样的知识一直被掩盖,公众知之甚少。
  我们在这里谈种族差异是带着建设性的态度,绝不是要散布仇恨。实事求是的面对有利于我们构建更加和谐公正的社会,对公共政策,私人决定等都有重要参考价值。西方白左无视科学认为各种族平均智商都相同,所以某些族群过的更加吃力就会认为是出于该族群遭受歧视,于是产生怨气,造成族群对立,不利于社会和谐。
  本次我们编辑整理了两位着名专家探讨此问题的视频,他们分别是特拉华大学着名心理学教授琳达·高德弗里森以及加拿大西安大略大学的着名学者菲利普·拉实顿。
  在此我们也附上了琳达·高德弗里森教授的两篇学术论文,感兴趣的读者可以详细研究。其中一篇最初刊登在《华尔街日报》上,有52名专家学者签名认同其研究成果。另一篇的内容是高德弗里森教授谈菲利普·拉实顿教授的研究的可靠性。
  下图为52名专家的全部名单,包括来自美国、英国和加拿大的多个名牌大学的学者。

""

  学术论文的百度网盘链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/17sUfcD_tJBrcUyVJwFpg0A
  提取码:4gfr



""

""

""
""

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2018/10/6

旧文章ID:19149

Chinese and US Engagement with Developing Countries News Roundup: July 8 – July 22, 2019

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

Every two weeks, The Carter Center’s China Program releases an overview of major events involving Chinese and US global engagement, with a particular focus on emerging issues in Africa and Latin America. In addition to using news sources, the news roundup will analyze papers and reports from academic journals, governmental bodies, and NGOs, and will also summarize debates and other events organized by think tanks on select issues. The news roundup is intended to be a platform and resource for both China watchers and for readers interested in political and economic development in developing countries. It aims to deepen the understanding of China’s foreign policy, and emerging issues and trends in developing countries, as well as to enhance the prospect of multinational cooperation among China, the U.S., Africa and Latin America.

""

How can Africa’s exporters gain from its free trade area? Is Sudan being exploited by foreign powers? Why are these African countries defending China’s mass detention of Muslims? Click here to check out those stories and more in the second July edition of the news roundup!
 ""



来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19148

U.S.-China Relations: The Education Factor by Mary Brown Bullock

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“Education relations have long been viewed as deepening and stabilizing U.S. – China relations. Today’s extensive ties have been made possible by historic and cultural traditions, high level political support from both governments, and the globalization of both Chinese and American universities. Recently, however, critics of the relationship have come to the fore. Articles titled “The Failure of American Universities in China,” “China’s Pernicious Presence on American Campuses,” or “Chinese Power ‘may lead to global academic censorship crisis’” are just a few examples.”

From U.S.-China Relations: The Education Factor by Mary Brown Bullock, former Executive Vice Chancellor of Duke Kunshan University and former President of Agnes Scott College.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""
(Credit: Duke University)


来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19147

The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of U.S.-China Relations by Richard Bush and Shelley Rigger

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“After 1949, there were many obstacles to normalization of relations between the United States and the new People’s Republic of China (PRC), but Taiwan was no doubt a key obstacle. The Kuomintang-led Republic of China (ROC) government and armies had retreated there. Washington maintained diplomatic relations with the ROC government and, in 1954-55, acceded to Chiang Kai-shek’s entreaties for a mutual defense treaty. After June 1950 with the outbreak of the Korean conflict, the United States took the position that the status of the island of Taiwan— whether it was part of the sovereign territory of China—was “yet to be determined.” More broadly, PRC leaders regarded the United States as a threat to their regime, particularly because of its support for the ROC, and American leaders viewed China as a threat to peace and stability in East Asia and to Taiwan, which they saw as an ally in the containment of Asian communism in general and China in particular. It was from Taiwan’s Ching Chuan Kang (CCK) airbase, for example, that U.S. B-52s flew bombing missions over North Vietnam.”

From The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of U.S.-China Relations by Richard Bush, Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution and the Michael H. Armacost Chair and Chen-Fu and Cecilia Yen Koo Chair in Taiwan Studies in the Center for East Asia Policy Studies (CEAP), and Shelley Rigger, Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute’s Asia Program and Brown Professor of East Asian Politics, Davidson College.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""                        ""
(Credit: Brookings)                                      (Credit: Foreign Policy Research Institute)






来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19146

Chinese Americans and China: A Fraught and Complicated Relationship by Gordon H. Chang

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“January 1, 1979 for many Chinese Americans (those of Chinese ancestry who are U.S. citizens or permanent residents) was a joyous moment. They enthusiastically welcomed the normalization of relations between the United States and the People’s Republic of China as it ended the politically charged and long-hostile relationship between the two countries: one, their land of ancestry — no matter that for some it was four or five generations past — and the other, their land of nationality for themselves and their families for now and the future. Few saw the moment as validating the politics of either the PRC or the U.S. – politics per se was not the reason for celebration. A major step toward full social and cultural acceptance in American life was the reason for Chinese American hopefulness.”

From Chinese Americans and China: A Fraught and Complicated Relationship by Gordon H. Chang, Olive H. Palmer Professor, Stanford University.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""
(Credit: Stanford University)

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19145

Financial System Engagement and Harmonization by David Dollar

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“During the 40 years since the normalization of U.S.-China relations, a key issue has been financial system engagement and harmonization. U.S. public and private institutions have played important roles in the reform and modernization of China’s financial system. China’s financial system, broadly understood, has also been a source of tension and conflict between the two countries from time to time.”

From Financial System Engagement and Harmonization by David Dollar, Senior Fellow, John L. Thornton China Center, Brookings Institution.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""
(Credit: Brookings)

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19144

Sino-American Interactions, Past and Future by Amb. Chas W. Freeman, Jr. (USFS, Ret.)

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“December 15, 2018 will mark the fortieth anniversary of Jimmy Carter’s and Deng Xiaoping’s politically courageous agreement to “normalize” the relationship between Washington and Beijing. This resulted in the replacement of China’s demand for revolutionary overthrow of the world order with pragmatic accommodation of it. Two days later, at the 3rd Plenum of the 11th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Deng launched China on a path of eclectic borrowing of foreign ideas, policies, and practices called “reform and opening” [改革开放]. This liberated the Chinese people – who were then almost a fourth of humanity – from the most suffocating aspects of Soviet Marxist-Leninist dogma and released their formidable entrepreneurial imaginations and energies. The consequences of Deng’s twin decisions for both China and the world have been immense. He saw US-China normalization and “reform and opening” as parts of a single bold gamble with his country’s future. His vision enabled China to risk a search for inspiration in America and other capitalist democracies, to which the Chinese elite promptly entrusted its sons and daughters for education.”

From Sino-American Interactions, Past and Future by Amb. Chas W. Freeman, Jr. (USFS, Ret.), Senior Fellow, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""
(Credit: Brown University)

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19143

The United States and China from Partners to Competitors by Harry Harding

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“Although the collapse of the Soviet Union had eliminated the common threat that had brought China and the U.S. together in the 1960s and 1970s, there were other reasons to prevent a return to continued confrontation. For the U.S, the economic growth being generated by China’s policy of reform and opening meant that China would play an increasingly important role in Asia and even globally. For China, positive ties with the United States were essential to the success of that policy, given the importance of American capital and American markets. For both governments, therefore, the Sino-American relationship was too important to fail.”

From The United States and China from Partners to Competitors by Harry Harding, professor of Public Policy at University of Virginia; visiting professor of Social Science at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""
(Credit: University of Virginia)

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19142

A Crisis is a Terrible Thing to Waste by Ryan Hass

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“The U.S.-China relationship has now reached what respected China scholar David M. Lampton describes as a “tipping point.i” The basic assumptions and expectations that guided the development of U.S.-China relations over the past 40 years no longer hold and, so far, no consensus has formed in either country about what should replace them. This paper seeks to contribute a perspective on the future trajectory of U.S.-China relations by addressing how the relationship reached its current inflection point, why this moment may differ from previous periods of bilateral friction, and what key questions the United States needs to answer about the type of relationship it seeks with China going forward.”

From A Crisis is a Terrible Thing to Waste by Ryan Hass, David M. Rubenstein Fellow, John L. Thornton China Center and the Center for East Asia Policy Studies, Brookings Institution.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""
(Credit: Brookings)

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19141

The Role of American NGOs and Civil Society Actors in an Evolving U.S.-China Relationship by Elizabeth Knup

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“When we think about the US-China bilateral relationship we often think about economics, trade, politics and strategic security. Less prominent in our discussion is the dimension of our relationship uniquely driven by American NGOs and civil society actors. And yet, American NGOs and civil society actors were instrumental in preparing the groundwork in the United States for the normalization of US-China relations in 1979. Their nimble, innovative, and independent nature meant that after 1979 they could move quickly to lead early and direct engagement with China and could respond to challenges and opportunities with agility. Their diversity created a rich network of organizations and individuals that expanded as China developed. That network of non-governmental actors facilitated communication, knowledge generation, and trust-building between the United States and China at all levels of society, from Track 2 dialogues to grassroots people-to-people exchanges (including then-Vice President Xi Jinping’s visit to Iowa where he met average citizens and built relationships that are now manifest in formal US-China relations), often keeping channels of communication open when formal channels were constrained. The nature of NGOs – independent from government and commercial imperatives, flexible in the face of change or opportunity – gives these organizations unique agency in framing and shaping the contours of the Sino-US relationship.”

From The Role of American NGOs and Civil Society Actors in an Evolving U.S.-China Relationship by Elizabeth Knup, Ford Foundation.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""
(Credit: Ford Foundation)

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19140

China’s Economic Transformation: A Threat to the Liberal Global Order? by Arthur R. Kroeber

0

作者:  来源:US-China Perception Monitor

“In the phrase of Council on Foreign Relations scholar Elizabeth Economy, “China is an illiberal state seeking leadership in a liberal world order.” This is an unpleasant fact for analysts and policy makers who believed for years that China’s general trajectory under “reform and opening” was towards a less statist economy and a more liberal state whose values and interests were increasingly consistent with those of the global economic system. The central question today therefore is whether, as it gains global influence, China will be generally supportive of the existing global economic system, cause that system to change in significant ways, or result in a dissolution of the present order and its replacement by something else. The answer to this question depends to a great degree on the time frame one uses to describe China’s trajectory. Here we will consider three: the 40 years since the launch of Reform and Opening in 1978, the two decades since the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98, and the decade since the American financial crisis of 2008.”

From China’s Economic Transformation: A Threat to the Liberal Global Order? by Arthur R. Kroeber, nonresident Senior Fellow, Brookings-Tsinghua Center and adjunct professor at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs.

Written for the Carter Center’s symposium to commemorate President Carter’s 1979 decision to normalize relations with China. View or download the paper here.

""
(Credit: New York University)

来源时间:2019/7/26   发布时间:2019/7/26

旧文章ID:19139